Wall Street Journal: Vax Drives Variants

Article accuses "experts" of spreading misinformation!

In a stunning endorsement of until-now-censored science, the Wall Street Journal has published an article entitled “Are Vaccines Fueling New Covid Variants?”

Focusing on COVID variant XBB, the piece does pretend that the “vaccines” were originally safe and effective. However, in an unprecedented display of dissent from the “safe and effective” narrative, the article presents damning evidence that the shots are now devastatingly counter-productive.

Written by Allysia Finley, a veteran journalist and member of the WSJ Editorial Board, virtually every paragraph of the article contains a point that would have been immediately censored only a few months ago. Referencing studies published in Nature and the New England Journal of Medicine, these include:

• “Under selective evolutionary pressures, the virus appears to have developed mutations that enable it to transmit more easily and escape antibodies elicited by vaccines.”

• “Growing evidence suggests that repeated vaccinations may make people more susceptible to XBB and could be fueling the virus’s rapid evolution.”

• “Antibody levels of people who had received four shots were 145 times as high against the original Wuhan strain as the XBB variant … Experts nevertheless claim that boosters improve protection against XBB. That’s disinformation, to use their favored term.”

• [Workers at the Cleveland Clinic] who received three more doses were 3.4 times as likely to get infected as the unvaccinated, while those who received two were only 2.6 times as likely.

Side note: The importance of this point can not be overstated. Boosters make you 260% to 340% more likely to catch the new variant. In this context, using the word “only” in front of a 2.6X increase in infection risk can only be read as sarcasm!

• “Experts refuse to concede that boosters have yielded diminishing benefits and may even have made individuals and the population as a whole more vulnerable to new variants like XBB.”

• The Biden administration’s monomaniacal focus on vaccines over new treatments has left the highest-risk Americans more vulnerable to new variants. Why doesn’t that seem to worry the experts?

Well worth reading in its entirety, the article (at least for now) is outside the WSJ paywall, so it can be read and shared freely.

The COVID vax campaign was built on the mantra of “safe and effective.” The “effective” part is now coming under attack by mainstream researchers and journalists. How much longer will it be until they start looking at the “safe” claim?