Defeating "Divide and Conquer"

If it were easy, we would have done it by now

Note: Nothing in the following essay should be interpreted as advocating or condoning violence in any way, shape, or form. Words such as “fight” and “army” are to be understood figuratively, as they are used in common parlance in terms such as “fight for equality” and “army of social justice warriors.” Words such as “resistance” and “opposition” should be understood as referring to peaceful, legal, non-violent expression of opinions and concerns.

Earlier today, I cross-posted an article from a blog called Taboo Truth, which most people would consider virulently anti-Semitic, or at a bare minimum, anti-Zionist. I myself am Jewish, both by heritage and religion, and I consider myself a Zionist, in that I am a strong supporter of Israel's right to exist and defend itself against Arab aggression.

So, why in the world would I promote something so diametrically opposed to my own self-interest?

I'll tell you why.

I'm never going to agree with Karl, author of Taboo Truth, about National Socialism and some other rather fundamental ideological issues. I would never condone his revisionist views about the Holocaust, the Third Reich, or his theories that assert a malevolent influence of Jews on global events. I consider the premises of his “Jewish Issue” ideology abhorrent and dangerous.

But my perspective is this: the existing global power elite is a danger to humanity, and is actively working to exterminate most of the world's population. The WEF has emerged as the nexus for this effort, which sprang forth fully-formed in 2020, under the pretext of covid response. Karl and I can agree on that, and, dear reader, you probably can too.

The oldest trick in the book is "divide and conquer." It's how the incumbents in every office from dog-catcher to president stay in office. They use wedge issues like race, religion, sex, abortion, and gun control to ensure that the people stay fractured and don't unite against them.

Building a coalition of opponents to an entrenched power structure is the only way to defeat one. It’s how the Whig party broke the two-party stranglehold on the White House in 1840 and 1848; they brought together a motley assortment of malcontents who were united in opposition to Andrew Jackson's policies. And they won, not once but twice (oddly enough, both Whig Presidents died shortly after being elected, and were replaced by less-radical vice presidents).

If we're going to survive as a species (and not as bug-eating, brain-chipped slaves), we need to put aside our other differences - even and especially the very major ones - and come together as people who want to live and be free. White Nationalist, Zionist, Transexual, Islamist ... They keep us labelling each other and fighting amongst ourselves so that we won't fight them.

We don't have to like each other, condone each other's worldview, or want our children to marry, but we do need to unite in opposition to The Great Reset and its transhumanist, genocidal agenda.

If we want to live, we need to gather an Army of Life that includes people we might otherwise consider our enemies.

If and when we succeed in defeating these psychopaths, which I refer to as the Army of Death, we can go back to our separate corners and point fingers at each other, if that's what we want to do.

But right now, we have bigger fish to fry. There is no bigger issue. Everything depends upon it.